Primer: Dictatorships can be good

In our first debate of the spring quarter, NU Political Union will consider the following question: Can an undemocratic government be a force for good in a country, benefitting the country instead of hurting it? 

While this debate topic will perhaps seem like a moot question to some, given the almost universal approbation of democracy in the US and, correspondingly, the multitude of historical examples of destructive dictatorships, it offers, in truth, significant food for thought. Indeed, with the economic rise of autocratic regimes such as China in recent decades and the seemingly intractable problems faced by important democracies such as the US, some have contended that benevolent dictatorship may hold notable advantages over democracy. Critics of democracy, such as Lee Kuan Yew, the President of Singapore from 1959 to 1990, have, for instance, contended, in this manner, that, in practical, economic terms, nondemocracy may bring far more developmental benefits to a country than democracy. The standard arguments in favor of democracy that most of us are likely at least somewhat familiar with—that, as a form of government, it is more accountable, preserves the inherent rights of citizens, etc.—are compelling. At the same time, however, arguments in favor of a dictatorial government may, it seems, perhaps hold some truth, as well. 

Ultimately, therefore, one can likely argue this question either way. To prepare you to weigh this highly disputable matter, we have, as always, in this primer, compiled some outside sources that you may find helpful.   


First, this article from Freedom House, discussing the rise of authoritarianism worldwide over the past couple of decades, provides solid context for the debate. [5 minutes]

Next, perhaps read this essay, selected by the Carnegie Council to win an essay contest, arguing that while democracy is imperfect, it represents the best available form of government.  [6 minutes]

Also, consider reading this piece in The New Yorker, which makes a case against democracy, centered around the fact that most voters are relatively uninformed about politics. [8 minutes]

Finally, if you have time, look at this paper from two international law professors at Stanford, contending that authoritarianism can provide a critical juncture in economic development. It is far too long to read entirely, but you will get the main idea of it from the overview at the beginning. [3 minutes]

"Flag-map of the world (2018)" by H8edge is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Previous
Previous

Primer: Regulating Big Tech

Next
Next

Primer: Presidential Elections